Stickman91's Banner
Stickman91

Age/Gender: 18, Male
Location: Land of Colorful Shapes
Job: Bullet Dodger

I'm in love with Charlie Foxtrot.

Newgrounds Stats

Sign-Up Date:
10/25/08

Level: 15
Aura: Light

Rank: Police Officer
Blams: 408
Saves: 159
Rank #: 14,494

Exp. Points: 2,240 / 2,500
Exp. Rank #: 13,523
Voting Pow.: 5.67 votes

BBS Posts: 193 (0.44 per day)
Flash Reviews: 86
Music Reviews: 39
Trophies: 0
Stickers: 0

Entry #16

Jump to Entry: [ 1712 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 ]


Stickman91

Learn about my amazing phallic experience and you could win a prize!

Posted by Stickman91 Oct. 13, 2009 @ 6:30 PM EDT

I just had one of the best masturbation sessions of my entire life.

There was just enough non-sexual filler in the beginning to build a sufficiently good setting and background story, but not so much of it that I got bored.

After that was taken care of, I rapidly progressed to the next phase, in which I underwent a series of small, but highly satisfying non-ejaculatory orgasms for a while. I had at least five of those.

I then felt that I was ready to let it all out. I branched off from the original storyline of my fantasy, "resetting" some things along the way, and got settled into the next chapter of my journey.

No more than ten seconds later, I climaxed at the perfect time, right when the intensity of this chapter was really ramping up. The mixture of feelings was so beautifully awesome that I involuntarily paused from bouncing up and down on my bed due to my inability to process the extreme amount of euphoria surging through my body. At least I think that's why it happened.

Anyway, it felt so damn good that I passed out on my bed after no more than what seemed like five minutes of resting in my ejaculate. This, ladies and gentlemen, is indeed masturbation at its finest.

About thirty minutes ago, I woke up from almost a full hour of undisturbed rest, feeling ridiculously pumped. I quickly realized that my heavenly experience definitely warranted a news post. So I cleaned myself up with great efficacy, and here I am, revealing the details of my rapturous masturbation session with you.

Of course, I haven't revealed all the details, which is why I'm offering a prize to the first person who is able to uncover this rather important one: What was I masturbating to?

Yes, what was the masturbatory fantasy that caused me to experience such an enormous amount of pleasure that I felt compelled to share the details of my progression through it with all you amazing creatures? That is what you must uncover, if you are to obtain the much-coveted prize of nine cents, which I willingly and gladly offer up in exchange for your successful efforts.

EDIT[11/2/09]: The prize is no longer available, as the contents of my amazing phallic experience have been revealed! However, since nobody actually won the nine cents, I shall save them for another occasion. Or maybe I'll just spend them on this truly beautiful object:

True_beauty_.jpg

Updated: 11/02/09 11:55 AM Log in to comment! | Share this!

The People Have Spoken

45 Comments

Oct. 13, 2009 | 6:36 PM max15946 says:

Porn, Duh!?

Oct. 13, 2009 | 6:47 PM Stickman91 responds:

You must be more specific than that if you wish to obtain the prize!


Oct. 14, 2009 | 3:45 AM Sinitech says:

You were masturbating while going through my news post history.

Oct. 14, 2009 | 9:16 PM Stickman91 responds:

No, that wasn't what I was masturbating to this time around.

.....

But I've done it in the past.

The first time I tried to, I was sure there would be nothing that would excite me...I was just bored...and desperate.

BUT BOY WAS I WRONG.

http://sinitech.newgrounds.com/ne ws/post/311650


Oct. 15, 2009 | 3:20 PM zerogeass says:

da fuck kinda post is this!

Oct. 15, 2009 | 8:11 PM Stickman91 responds:

It's a post about life, my son.

And don't you want to make a guess? You can make as many guesses as you want, all of them absolutely free of charge. AND, you could win nine WHOLE cents! WOW!


Oct. 16, 2009 | 3:59 AM Sinitech says:

Your score for "Keep Fucking That Chicken" is really low, even though I thought it was hilarious.

They're just jealous that you thought of it first!

That's it!

And Bill Gates is black!

Oct. 16, 2009 | 12:12 PM Stickman91 responds:

I know!!!! I swear, NOBODY on this site likes bestiality!!

I put SO much work into that Flash and people are just voting down because they don't like it! They're jealous that I thought of it first AND they're jealous of my amazing Photoshop skills!!! I'm SO ANGRY!!!

You're right, THAT'S IT!! I'm never doing another Flash again!!!!!!!!!!! AND I'M LEAVING TIHS SITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!! FOREVWR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!

UNVTC842Q99uctn9x2p;QNnqoisegn230 9tcER3QOC;T3of90guw2n

also bill gates likes oranges


Oct. 17, 2009 | 1:41 AM nietzlawe says:

You were jacking off to a story in a book. Now whether that was vanilla, BDSM or tentacle porn, one can only wonder.

How's my aim?

(Not my cum aim obviously)

Oct. 17, 2009 | 6:08 PM Stickman91 responds:

Well, I was actually looking for what my fantasy consisted of, as opposed to the medium through which I enjoyed it.

Vanilla sex, BDSM, tentacles? Maybe, maybe not! Take a guess!


Oct. 18, 2009 | 12:55 AM zerogeass says:

you were jackin off to "never ending dream" the movie with that gay ass white dragon, and the uber long flight scene thing.

Oct. 18, 2009 | 1:36 PM Stickman91 responds:

Nope.


Oct. 18, 2009 | 4:43 AM Sensationalism says:

Edward from Twilight.

Oct. 18, 2009 | 1:37 PM Stickman91 responds:

Nope!


Oct. 18, 2009 | 9:25 AM nietzlawe says:

We need clues. Is it a fetish of some sort?

Oct. 18, 2009 | 1:40 PM Stickman91 responds:

Well, there are so many different things out there to get off to, so I guess I do need to give at least ONE hint.

Yes, it was a fetish.

Although there are about a zillion fetishes out there, so this hint probably won't do much.

Updated: Oct. 18, 2009, 1:41 PM

Oct. 19, 2009 | 12:28 AM manicjudgement says:

You were masturbating to a furry Hitler sucking Marilyn Monroe's strap-on.

Oct. 19, 2009 | 12:00 PM Stickman91 responds:

Nopeness.


Oct. 19, 2009 | 12:55 AM Sensationalism says:

Into water sports, eh?

Oct. 19, 2009 | 12:01 PM Stickman91 responds:

Well, that all depends on the context...


Oct. 19, 2009 | 6:40 AM Sinitech says:

methionylglutaminylarginyltyrosylglut amylserylleucy-lphenylalanylalanylglu taminylleucyllysylglutamylarginyllysy lglutamy-lglycylalanylphenylalanylval ylprolylphenylalanylvalylthreonylleu-
cylglycylaspartylprolylglycylisoleucy lglutamylglutaminylserylleucyll-ysyli soleucylaspartylthreonylleucylisoleuc ylglutamylalanylglycylala-nylaspartyl alanylleucylglutamylleucylglycylisole ucylprolylphenylala-nylserylaspartylp rolylleucylalanylaspartylglycylprolyl threonylisoleu-cylglutaminylaspfragin ylalanylthreonylleucylarginylalanylph enylal-anylalanylalanylglycylvalylthr eonylprolylalanylglutaminylcysteinyl-
phenylalanylglutamylmethionylleucylal anylleucylisoleucylarginylg-lutaminyl lysylhistidylprolylthreonylisoleucylp rolylisoleucylglycylleuc-ylleucylmeth ionyltyrosylalanylasparaginylleucylva lylphenylalanyla-sparaginyllysylglycy lisoleucylaspartylglutamylphenylalany ltyrosyla-lanylglutaminylcysteinylglu tamyllysylvalylglycylvalylaspartylser ylv-alylleucylvalylalanylaspartylvaly lprolylvalylglutaminylglutamylserylal -anylprolylphenylalanylarginylglutami nylalanylalanylleucylarginylhi-stidyl asparaginylvalylalanylprolylisoleucyl phenylalanylisoleucylcyst-einylprolyl prolylaspartylalanylaspartylaspartyla spartylleucylleucy-larginylglutaminyl isoleucylalanylseryltyrosylglycylargi nylglycyltyrosy-lthreonyltyrosylleucy lleucylserylarginylalanylglycylvalylt hreonylglycy-lalanylglutamylasparagin ylarginylalanylalanylleucylprolylleuc ylas-paraginylhistidylleucylvalylalan yllysylleucyllysylglutamyltyrosylaspa r-aginylalanylalanylprolylprolylleucy lglutaminylglycylphenylalanylgly-cyli soleucylserylalanylprolylaspartylglut aminylvalyllysylalanylalany-lisoleucy laspartylalanylglycylalanylalanylglyc ylalanylisoleucylseryl-glycylserylala nylisoleucylvalyllysylisoleucylisoleu cylglutamylglutamin-ylhistidylasparag inylisoleucylglutamylprolylglutamylly sylmethiony-lleucylalanylalanylleucyl lysylvalylphenylalanylvalylglutaminyl prolyl-methionyllysylalanylalanylthre onylarginylserine?

Oh, that's a real word by the way.

I'm going to come right out and say, everyone is wrong and that word is not the name of a protein, but is in fact, describing every detail of what you were masturbating to.

Ergo, I win. Give me my money, bitch.

Oct. 19, 2009 | 12:04 PM Stickman91 responds:

Very good guess! You would've been the proud recipient of nine lovely cents had you not forgotten one letter somewhere in the middle. Sorry!


Oct. 19, 2009 | 1:11 PM nietzlawe says:

Getting off on making people try and guess what gets you off.

Pussysmothering? Something to do with feet? Uniform fetish of some sort?

Oct. 19, 2009 | 9:41 PM Stickman91 responds:

Heh heh. :)

No, none of those. I'm trying to think of another hint though; you sound like you really want those nine cents!

Well, I'll tell you this: it had nothing to do with any particular body part or any particular clothing style.


Oct. 20, 2009 | 12:45 AM Sinitech says:

Vacuum cleaners!

Gotcha, mother fucker.

Oct. 20, 2009 | 5:58 PM Stickman91 responds:

Nope! It had nothing to do with any household appliances/electronics.


Oct. 20, 2009 | 1:10 PM Emanhattan says:

"You're one of the few people on this site that has the balls to make this sort of thing, and I really respect that!
As for the actual content, it was pretty good; you definitely focused more on "shock value" than animation, as you seem to like doing. Admittedly, it was pretty easy to see the joke coming, but the way you switched scenes so abruptly still got a good laugh out of me. Plus, I kind of have a thing for "shock" material; it just makes me happy that people aren't afraid to indulge in stuff that's taboo under normal circumstances.
Anyway, this was very enjoyable, well done!"

what does this mean in english

Oct. 20, 2009 | 6:00 PM Stickman91 responds:

Oh fuckballs! I forgot to translate! Allow me to do that now:

wegujwn9vt8o 90ug2094ut5vcrle;hm5l;e k;'4'jpt4okj;ptvq2;oqvv'[q potyjv 0q[wg033o1[ 4w53q'y3qH#%
TY%^%$#%yoljho'voy'
H3i53h/hn6jmphjmi5yjhjni6o5yjg5iy k,hj;k.[9\poilpku[oyj79u0ipjgnbgv f4pk]ht.;b,mneu'qbamk
jpw4

Yep, I'm pretty sure that's correct. Sorry for the inconvenience!


Oct. 20, 2009 | 8:20 PM flashwarrior says:

You obviously had six dry orgasms not five, HA I'VE GOT YOU AGAIN, but no, keep your pennies I need none just a flex compassidor will do.

Oct. 21, 2009 | 10:45 AM Stickman91 responds:

...You didn't answer the question!

Also, what's a flex compassidor? Never heard of it.


Oct. 20, 2009 | 9:23 PM nietzlawe says:

Needle in a haystack this game.

Did you jack off over something that isn't human?

(Its like playing Guess Who this)

Oct. 21, 2009 | 10:49 AM Stickman91 responds:

It wasn't over an animal, human, animal/human hybrid, or any other creature. It was over a specific act rather than an animate or inanimate entity.

Updated: Oct. 21, 2009, 10:50 AM

Oct. 22, 2009 | 5:15 PM MarcusRulzeOMG says:

A stick figure.

Oct. 22, 2009 | 10:32 PM Stickman91 responds:

Nopers. See my response to the comment above yours.


Oct. 23, 2009 | 10:31 AM Sinitech says:

It was someone shitting in someone else' mouth.

Or their own mouth.

Or something equally horrifying that wouldn't surprise me.

Oct. 24, 2009 | 9:31 AM Stickman91 responds:

Nope, nothing to do with scat.


Oct. 23, 2009 | 7:29 PM nietzlawe says:

A specific act? This has even my mind perplexed into the Perfect Plex wrestling finisher hold.

Oct. 24, 2009 | 9:36 AM Stickman91 responds:

No wrestling was going on, nor was any other kind of aggressive fighting. But I'll tell you this: the first part of the act involves grabbing.


Oct. 24, 2009 | 3:20 PM flashwarrior says:

YOU NEVER WATCHED BACK TO THE FUTURE WAT

Oct. 24, 2009 | 9:47 PM Stickman91 responds:

?!?!?!?!?

FLEX COMPASSIDOR?????


Oct. 25, 2009 | 10:08 AM SuperMarioBrosS says:

Happy first anniversary!

That's one year you have been on Newgrounds!

Oct. 25, 2009 | 1:57 PM Stickman91 responds:

Yeah!

It's been lots of fun, and the community is really awesome. I'll probably be here for a quite a while. :)


Oct. 25, 2009 | 9:47 PM Sinitech says:

Grabbing...

Grabbing...

I've got nothin'.


Oct. 25, 2009 | 9:47 PM Sinitech says:

Unless...

Could it be...?


Oct. 25, 2009 | 9:47 PM Sinitech says:

... You are a sick, sick man.

Oct. 25, 2009 | 11:56 PM Stickman91 responds:

I have no idea what you're referring to. But I feel that I must point something out.

It took you three whole comments to get your vague point across. Now, just stop. Stop and think of all the children in Africa who could've used those two extra comments that you irreversibly wasted. For shame! You are clearly the only sicko here!


Oct. 27, 2009 | 9:09 PM nietzlawe says:

I can't guess, there are too many things in the world. I fear that it will forever remain a mystery.

Oct. 27, 2009 | 9:40 PM Stickman91 responds:

Perhaps...

Yes, perhaps...


Oct. 27, 2009 | 10:59 PM nietzlawe says:

I sometimes try the reverse psychology scam, pretend I don't care anymore, in the small hope that you will reveal your fantasy out of sympathy.

But what is more mysterious and strange is why would I confess that I am in the midst of a Reverse Psychology scam, I mean it completely destroys my plan in its entirety and gives you a further reason not to reveal the Unknown Quantity.

BUT, what if me confessing that I am cooking a Reverse Psychology scam is just an attempt to earn your trust and make you reveal the Unknown Quantity out of pure sympathy and generosity.

What if its like looking into a tv screen and seeing a man watching television and then seeing that on his television screen, he is watching a man watching television... And so on... Where does it stop? Does it change to a woman occasionally? Does it even matter? What is my point? How many television screens can our eyes see inwards? Does anybody care? I care, because we might be a part of the chain, the sequence that never ends until......

The final man is watching his television screen and he doesn't see a man watching television, he sees something quite extrordinary instead, the grand master of all mysteries!

Shall I tell you what he saw? See! Its not fun to not know the answers is it!

I will tell you what the final man saw in his television screen, if you tell me what you jacked off over.... It seems like a lot of trouble to go to for both of us, but we've come this far now and I don't see either of us treading back across our original footprints.....

Oct. 28, 2009 | 11:39 AM Stickman91 responds:

Hmm, this is interesting. Sinitech claims to know what was on that screen as well, which makes me think: Do you both have the same answer to the same question? Which one of you should I believe? Should I even believe one of you? If you both have different answers, then I will most certainly keep The Unknown Quantity a secret.

How about this: If the two of you want any hope of discovering my fantasy, each one of you should send me a PM telling me what's on the final television screen. If you both send me the same answer, I'll reveal my fetish in the form of a hint, which will lead the way to the place where it may be uncovered.

HOWEVER, you both must solemnly swear that the two of you will not collaborate in deceitful trickery by discussing the answer with each other beforehand! Swear upon whatever it is that you enjoy swearing upon - whether it be God, a Bible, your mother, or a candle - in a comment, and leave it here. If and when you both choose to do this, I will be awaiting a PM from each of you from that point on.

This is interesting indeed, and I'm eager to see what will happen here...


Oct. 28, 2009 | 12:15 AM Sinitech says:

I know what was on the final TV.

Oct. 28, 2009 | 11:39 AM Stickman91 responds:

See above response.


Oct. 28, 2009 | 2:26 PM nietzlawe says:

But that way, you get to discover what was on the tv and once again have the upper hand in this deadlock saga and we only get an hint to help us in our quest for the Unknown Quantity AKA Holy Grail.

Oct. 28, 2009 | 7:19 PM Stickman91 responds:

You know, you're right. Forget about me only giving you a hint; I'll lay The Unknown Quantity out for all the world to see! Provided, of course, that both you and Sinitech give me the same answer to what was on the final television, a.k.a. The Other Holy Grail!

Updated: Oct. 28, 2009, 7:22 PM

Oct. 28, 2009 | 11:10 PM nietzlawe says:

I will need 21 hours to consider your generous proposal.

Meanwhile, here is some nostalgia that you might enjoy reading to pass the time.

http://nietzlawe.newgrounds.com/news/
post/249791

Oct. 29, 2009 | 12:46 PM Stickman91 responds:

Yes, it was thoroughly enjoyed! :)

I'm trying to figure out if The Universal Prank is somehow connected to the mental hospital. It seems that way, seeing as many people on this site could easily be classified as "mental" by others, even if they aren't actually mental.

I've been thinking lately about words such as "mental," "normal," "weird" and "crazy," and you know what? They don't really mean anything in the context of the entire world. Look at the word normal. Everyone has a different idea of what's normal. Thus, there can't be a true global definition for the word. But these days, the majority of people seem to have accepted "normal" as a description of someone who's attracted to lean men or women and loves to party, among other things. And because of this, the word "normal" is now casually used in the popular media to describe people who fit said description, even though it may not mean anything to the man who's idea of normal is having sex with other men while being whipped by his sister.

Every person is different from every other person, and that's just the way it is. Which means that the word "different" also doesn't really have much meaning when used by itself. One would have to say something like "somewhat different," or "very different" to get a meaning across. Either way, people are who they are, and there's nothing that can be done about it. That's why I'm so strongly opposed to intolerance, no matter what form it comes in.

Anyway, I suppose I got off topic. Or did I? Regardless, that was a very entertaining blog you wrote. I'll have to read more of those old blogs of yours! I imagine that they would be very enjoyable to read at night, as you said...


Oct. 29, 2009 | 4:11 PM Sensationalism says:

Roman showers!!

Oct. 30, 2009 | 9:45 AM Stickman91 responds:

Nope!

Also, thank you for informing me of this valuable terminology! I shall store it in my mind for later use.


Oct. 29, 2009 | 6:38 PM nietzlawe says:

Everything in the world where there's cities and education, there is a system in place that is meant to be adhered to, it doesn't make it THE correct system, it just makes it A system and that particular system is beneficial to someone that wants to control large numbers of people. Its like swearing, swearing is just a word, but people will actually stop themselves from swearing, what makes it different from any other word, that's a form of conditioning in itself. The system makes itself known in many ways, such as 'normal' and 'different' like you said, all these things aid towards dividing and conquering people. People together are a force, but people alone are weak. Create division and classification if you want to obtain control.

I'm a big believer in taking the things that are meant to hurt us and shrug them off, learn to laugh at ourselves, laugh at each other, its a great way of relieving stress, letting go, someone that wants to control you, they want you to become upset by what they cause, but you don't need to let them, none of us do, we are all big and strong enough to deal with words and attitudes because when all is said and done, we're all freaks.

Oct. 30, 2009 | 10:54 AM Stickman91 responds:

I've thought about the swearing bit many times. I've even said my opinions on it out loud. "Fuck," "shit," and the like are just words; they're just a small part of an enormous collection of sounds that people interpret in different ways based on how they're conditioned. I fully agree with that, and I suppose that contributes to my strong distaste for censorship.

And while it may be true that every person has some "freakish" qualities, some people possess a greater number of these qualities than the average person; to the extent where these people are treated different from others who are - yes, I'm going to say it, albeit with quotation marks - "normal." Of course, these people are only "normal" by the majority of society's standards, but unfortunately, those standards are all that really matter when you're being interviewed for a job, or doing anything else that most people do. It's a fact of life, at least on this planet.

People naturally crave power; they want to bolster themselves and leave others in the dust; it's a part of human nature. Whether or not people actually do this, and the ways in which they do it, depends on how much consideration they have for their "inferiors," and when I say "inferior", I'm talking about someone with a lower salary, or lower grades, or even a lower score on a Flash movie submitted to Newgrounds that gets shuffled away into obscurity while another one with a higher score gets slapped on the front page for all to see.

Whether or not we, as a society, value one person's being, work, or personality over another is not always the choice of the person who's in a position to snag the spotlight. But when it is, it comes down to that person's conditioning, which is partially based in genetics and partially based on what he's experienced in life. When it's not, it comes down to the conditioning of others. "Others" may constitute one person, or it may constitute many people. Either way, these "others" are probably strangers to that aforementioned person who may or may not get the spotlight he so craves. Strangers who feel that it's their jobs to evaluate other people by one set of standards: their own. In any case, every entity that society assigns a value to - whether it's animate or inanimate, tangible or intangible, real or a merely a figment of someone's imagination - is judged by one set of standards, which may belong to one person, or to many.

And what gives the people who've created those standards this sort of feeling of responsibility and control? Adhering to societal standards, which are composed of the standards held by the majority of society, that's what. And so, all those "freaks" - the people who are more "freakish" than average - who don't adhere, simply because they were perhaps born with different genes and have experienced different things in their lives, aren't granted those privileged feelings.

However, if all those "freaks" united and stood up for themselves, chances are, they'd be able to acquire more privilege. It's an intriguing scenario, the uniting of - here I go again - the "different" people, by which of course, I mean the "very different" people. Imagine if they all united and broke off from the "normal" society and formed their own! It would be a society similar to the "normal" one, complete with laws and punishments. But there would be no standards for how to dress, how to talk, how to eat, or how to do anything. No matter how you choose to live your life, you'd be welcomed into the "freak" society, where you'd find an escape from the unjust, unconstructive criticisms of others that linger in the small sphere of "normality."

I suppose I'm fantasizing about the seemingly impossible... but is something like that really impossible? If it happened, it would be the ultimate shrugging off of the "normal" standards that all people, "freaks" included, are expected to follow. It would be the ultimate laugh, but the laugh would be directed at the world of standards and customs, and it would be coming from the "freaks," who've finally escaped from that world forever. It would be a truly magnificent and beautiful thing.

But will it ever happen? Only time will tell...

Updated: Oct. 30, 2009, 11:01 AM

Oct. 29, 2009 | 7:29 PM nietzlawe says:

Everything you need to know about England by Nietzlawe: Enjoy: Colons:

http://nietzlawe.newgrounds.com/news/
post/277852

Oct. 30, 2009 | 5:36 PM Stickman91 responds:

That was very enlightening! I've never been to Ze England, but if I ever go there, I'll be sure to keep your handy guide at my fingertips at all times!


Oct. 31, 2009 | 8:30 AM Sinitech says:

So anyways, I was doing my usual nude jogging the other night and I got 'pulled over.'

I thought the cop was going to be some hot chick that just wanted to get a good look at my tube-steak, but boy, I was wrong.

This mustachio'd motherfucker arrested me for indecent exposure. What the fuck kind of fucking fucker fuck shit is that? Fuck.

Oct. 31, 2009 | 9:40 AM Stickman91 responds:

That was you?

Shit, if I'd known, I would've let you off the hook... probably.

But come on, who jogs outdoors in his birthday suit when he's clearly suffering from elephantitis? I thought you were gonna knock an old lady over with those things swinging back and forth.

Well, at least I got a good scare this Halloween!

Oh, and about the mustache... tell Phobotech I'm sorry. I'd do it myself, but it's just too awkward at this point.


Nov. 1, 2009 | 11:09 PM nietzlawe says:

I will reveal all.

The final man was watching a television screen, only the actual screen was not a screen, it was a mirror. While looking into this mirror, he could see behind himself and noticed a small camera on the upper wall behind him. He had never noticed this camera before and had never realised that he was at the mercy of 345 voyeuristic perverts, the channel was a long one with many viewers.

The final man had masturbated to something phallic and hadn't realised that his act had been watched by 345 other people. The final man was called:

Stickman91.

Nov. 2, 2009 | 11:39 AM Stickman91 responds:

.....

I am truly shocked that so many people are interested enough in my amazing experiences that an entire channel is devoted to displaying them! I never knew they were so entertaining!

Whenever I masturbate with the intent to achieve an ejaculatory orgasm, my stimuli are never in a visible form; they are all in my head. Furthermore, the camera on the upper wall is unable to see the masturbatory actions, which are almost always concealed under at least one layer of bed sheets. The camera can almost never see anything going on; yet I have quite a substantial viewership. Interesting...

Anyway, I suppose it's my turn to reveal all... at the end of this paragraph, you will learn about my amazing phallic experience, although you won't win the nine cent prize, since that was reserved for the person who correctly discovered my fetish through guessing. But then again, the learning alone seems to be a most satisfactory prize for you.

Now, enough chit-chat. Learn and be satisified!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vora rephilia


Nov. 2, 2009 | 4:30 PM nietzlawe says:

The art of Vorarephilia, of course, the thought of being eaten. It can be human on human, giant animal, snakes, crocodiles.

Imagine that the picture of the doughnut you have provided was an actual living beast, and you fell into the centre of the hall. It would be such a tight squeeze, such a rubbery constriction as you slowly sink into the living creature's digestive fluids.

A world that might consume you, meant literally!

http://aryion.com/

Enjoy old chap!

Nov. 2, 2009 | 9:54 PM Stickman91 responds:

Ah, yes, I know about that site. I actually don't go there too often, but I like to browse through the forums once in a while. There's an enormous amount of stuff there.

Eka's Portal actually helped me learn about vore and its different variations. Some people like fantasizing about being eaten, while others enjoy thoughts of stuffing themselves. Some enjoy biting and tearing; others can't stand the sight of blood. I personally love being the prey, regardless of whether there's blood spilled in the process.

I often question where I got this unusual fixation from, and why I delight in it so much while others think it's disgusting. Is the cause of it wholly genetic, or were there environmental factors involved as well? I suppose I'll never know.

In any case, I don't mind being a vorarephile. I've gotten a vast amount of enjoyment out of my fetish; plus, it's nice to be different from the majority, regardless of whether or not your differences are obvious, at least in my opinion.

On a related note, that's no doughnut! Those are far too sweet for me. That beautiful chunk of edible matter is a bagel.

Updated: Nov. 2, 2009, 9:56 PM

Nov. 4, 2009 | 12:17 AM Sinitech says:

It's funny because I just got done masturbating with a bagel.

Nov. 4, 2009 | 11:13 AM Stickman91 responds:

So THAT'S why Nietzlawe thought it was a donut (of the glazed variety, of course)!


Nov. 4, 2009 | 12:48 PM nietzlawe says:

Sugar-coated-bagel.

"Yeah, uhh grunt... you're right... uhh... sugar." *Nervous laughter*

Nov. 5, 2009 | 8:52 AM Stickman91 responds:

Yep, sugar of the highest quality!


Nov. 4, 2009 | 3:15 PM TheSilverGuitar says:

Whoa since when have we had animated headers availible

Nov. 5, 2009 | 8:58 AM Stickman91 responds:

I'm not quite sure what happened with that banner. I saved it as an animated .gif in one program and uploaded it. At the time, I didn't know animated banners weren't allowed, but my file was accepted anyway (?!?!?). Later on, I tweaked the banner a little and made a .gif file out of it with a different program. I tried uploading it, and that's when I got the message saying I couldn't have an animated banner.

Weird. Maybe this banner was allowed because it only animates through one cycle?

The file that was accepted was made with Game Maker. It's free to download, so here's a link if you're interested:

http://www.yoyogames.com/gamemake r/try


Nov. 8, 2009 | 1:19 AM nietzlawe says:

Any new updates on the ol Vore front? What was your predator of choice? I chose a giantess, she likes to take her time, she's evil, she sucks on me for hours at a time before swallowing... She's not a biter and knows that I can't stand the sight of blood, especially my own.

Nov. 8, 2009 | 1:28 PM Stickman91 responds:

... So wait, you're into this stuff too?! Who woulda thunk it!

Well, I prefer the predator to be some kind of non-human animal. A real one, a semi-real one (e.g., a real one with some unnatural qualities), or a completely dreamed-up one; it's all good. I don't think I've ever seriously dealt with a human pred, though.

Updated: Nov. 8, 2009, 1:30 PM

Nov. 9, 2009 | 1:18 AM nietzlawe says:

I've had my vore days, back in the day... Of days that consisted of vore.

Snakes make good predators, anacondas/pythons, there was this fictional story on the Big Gulp archives where a snake coiled a human woman, it was hot, the devouring was great, they made some great fake pictures too.

Anything sticky or slimy is good, a venus fly-trap, that would be great.

Vore, one of life's guilty pleasures!


Nov. 9, 2009 | 1:23 AM nietzlawe says:

With the venus fly-trap, you fall down, you try to climb back up, digging your fingernails into the slimy sides and you get up a few inches, until you lose your footing and slide all the way back down again. Each time, you get bit nearer, only the problem is that you can never get anywhere near the top, its like an almost vertical slide, you need a grip that you don't possess.

"This time!"

Climbs up, really trying to hug the side, inching your way up through the slime very slowly, hoping that you don't lose your footing. That is until you get a bit further and then you feel it, that familiar feeling of slipping, as you slide back down to the bottom... Where you remain in a pool of digestion fluids.

Vore, one of life's guilty pleasures! Again...

Nov. 9, 2009 | 11:42 AM Stickman91 responds:

A guilty pleasure? I've never looked at it that way. If you enjoy something, then why would you feel guilty about enjoying it? Because of the possible reactions of others?

Eh, let others think what they will. If people only took pleasure in activities that others found appropriate, everyone would be the same, and the world would be incredibly boring and not really worth living in. Your individuality is a beautiful thing, and I don't see a reason to feel guilty about it.

So, you said you enjoyed vore "back in the day." Do you still enjoy it today, or have you moved on to other things?


Nov. 9, 2009 | 10:25 PM nietzlawe says:

Vore will always hold a place in my heart, in the Big Gulp days. I don't feel guilty about it at all, its just a saying. Now and again its fun to do a bit of vore roleplaying, its just imagination, energy and fantasy, just an opportunity to let go really and experience a feeling of giving yourself to another being.

I can't walk past that bagel without thinking its going to grab my leg......

Nov. 10, 2009 | 7:48 AM Stickman91 responds:

I've never done roleplaying in real life or on the web. How does it work exactly?

And I see what you're talking about... that bagel almost resembles a pair of lips...


Nov. 14, 2009 | 4:53 PM The-spammer says:

A strap-on dildo (also strap-on, dildo harness) is a dildo designed to be worn, usually with a harness, during sexual activity. Harnesses and dildos are made in a wide variety of styles, with variations in how the harness fits the wearer, how the dildo attaches to the harness, as well as various features intended to facilitate stimulation of the wearer or a sexual partner.
A strap-on dildo can be used for a wide variety of sexual activities, including solo or mutual masturbation, as well as penetrative oral, anal, or vaginal sex. Sexual lubricant is often used to ease insertion.

Strap-on dildos can be used by people of any sex or gender, upon people of any sex or gender. A person who does not have a penis may use a strap-on, as may a person whose penis does not allow for penetration, whether due to size or function. A person who does not want to use their penis for penetration may instead use a strap-on; this may include some trans women. Trans men may use strap-on dildos in order to facilitate experiencing sexual activity as many biological males do. People who are genderqueer or enjoy gender-bending may use a strap-on during sex in order to enjoy related forms of gender expression. Strap-on dildos are also used in kink scenes: those involving forced feminization of a man may involve the use of a strap-on upon that man, while those involving orgasm denial may involve a man using a strap-on upon a partner, to limit the amount of sexual stimulation which that man receives.

Nov. 15, 2009 | 3:19 PM Stickman91 responds:

Thank you!!!!


Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:19 PM Magnet-Boy says:

stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack
stack

Nov. 15, 2009 | 3:21 PM Stickman91 responds:

It's a beautiful stack indeed. Is my spoon anywhere in there?


Nov. 16, 2009 | 9:15 PM jakenator85 says:

Antidisestablishmentarianism.
or
Pneumonoultromicroscopicsilicovolcano coniosis?

Nov. 17, 2009 | 2:03 PM Stickman91 responds:

Actually, I prefer floccinaucinihilipilification. ;)

Jump to Entry: [ 1712 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 ]